Reading Frank Bidart’s new collection of poems Metaphysical Dog, I learned something about how I read poetry. I learned from the absence of something.
In reading a poetry collection, I usually look for one poem, any poem, that will center the entire collection for me. It might be the title poem, though it often isn’t. But one poem becomes, for me, the filter for the rest, a kind of prism of understanding what the poet has done with the poems he or she has included in this particular collection. I admit that this may be a practice peculiar to me.
I didn’t find that one poem in reading Metaphysical Dog, even after reading it three times.
However, I had a fall-back position. I ended up reading the collection of 39 poems as a single poem, each individual part blending into what preceded and what came after. I don’t believe Bidart wrote the poems that way, but that is how I ultimately understood the collection.
Collectively, and even when I break them apart individually, these poems pack a powerful emotional wallop. You begin the reading the first poem, the title poem, and without realizing it you’re soon hurtling through a highly personal, highly emotional experience.
The poems range across the poet’s life, not in chronological order but in what might be called an increasing intensity of experience. Here’s “Like, ” which comes early on in the poems:
Woe is blunted not erased
by like. Your hands were too full, then
empty. At the grave’s
lip, secretly you imagine then
refuse to imagine
a spectre
so like what you watched die, the unique
soul you loved endures a second death.
The dead hate like, bitter
when the living with too-small
grief replace them. You dread
loving again, exhausted by the hungers
ineradicable in his presence. You resist
strangers until a stranger makes the old hungers
brutally wake. We live by symbolic
substitution. At the grave’s lip, what is
but is not is what
returns you to what is not.
From there, Bidart doesn’t move forward or farther; he moves deeper, deeper into family, self, and gender confusion followed by acceptance (although acceptance arrives before confusion). He talks about, with, and to Walt Whitman, whom he could have been referring to in “Like.” He travels toward the absolute and then away from it.
He arrives, in “Of His Bones Are Coral Made, ” at transformation, and it is an arrival at the end of his life, not at the beginning:
He still trolled books, films, gossip, his own
past, searching not just for
ideas that dissect the mountain that
in his early old age he is almost convinced
cannot be dissected:
he searched for stories:
stories the pattern of whose
knot dimly traces the patterns of his own:
what is intolerable in
the world, which is to say
intolerable in himself, ingested, digested:
the stories that
haunt each of us, for each of us
rip open the mountain…
The four poems that follow are not so much post-climactic as they are a quiet acceptance and understanding.
Bidart has written numerous collections of poetry and received many awards, including the Wallace Stevens Award and the Bollingen Prize. He is a “presence” in contemporary American poetry, but more than that, he continues to create collections like Metaphysical Dog that perplex, amaze, provoke, and then, oddly, bring calm and understanding.
Image by articotrpopical. Sourced via Flickr. post by Glynn Young, author of the novels Dancing Priest and A Light Shining.
Browse more Poetry at Work
___________________________
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.
We’ll make your Saturdays happy with a regular delivery of the best in poetry and poetic things.
Need a little convincing? Enjoy a free sample.
- A History of Children’s Stories: “The Haunted Wood” by Sam Leith - May 20, 2025
- World War II Had Its Poets, Too - May 15, 2025
- Czeslaw Milosz, 1946-1953: “Poet in the New World” - May 13, 2025
Maureen Doallas says
Thoughtful look at Bidart, Glynn. I’m struck by the starkness, and the repetition that seems to betray some kind of deep seeking that isn’t resolved through memory and maybe not even through art.
Glynn says
Maureen – I think he uses repetition in exactly that way. These were deep poems to read and consider. And very personal – but that’s one of his trademarks.