There are times a word seems to hold the key to finding a whole life. And then there are times it seems the universe lacks the words for a thing even if given the whole dictionary. Tony Hoagland as much as says so again and again in his poems (though the poems themselves clearly illustrate the opposite to be true):
There is no single particular noun
for the way a friendship,
stretched over time, grows thin,
then one day snaps with a popping sound.
—from “Special Problems in Vocabulary”
He addresses the particular frailties of language in “Real Estate”:
I suppose evil is too strong a word.
I know the term zombie lacks a sense of proportion.
The poem takes a few pokes — at war, at raw capitalism, at self-actualization — especially observing the ways in which we are lulled into not only accepting such a state of things, but of buying it, wholesale:
They drag us into shallower and shallower waters.
They take what is dearest to us and use it as bait.
They turn our wishes into merchandise.
But where he lands halfway through “Real Estate,” and stays for the duration, is with the pillaging of the earth, and our seeming willingness (by way of neglecting to look up from either our devices or our navels) to go along with it:
When I found out, almost by accident,
that I had inherited the world —
that it was precious, that I was
responsible for keeping it safe —
Well, imagine how embarrassing it would be for you
to admit that you had been asleep;
I’m not sure the point of claiming a lack of appropriate words when what you create in the sequence of your stanzas is so much more than just that. He doesn’t say war is bad; he just tells about the general who admits the error of a certain bombing juxtaposed with the unaware self-awareness of the general saying “But it taught me a lot about myself.”
Hoagland finds the words to spur us on to good things by playing to our self-absorption before our altruism, reminding us that this could all be very embarrassing for us to discover that while we were sleeping, while we were not paying attention, while we were “watching the pretty pictures” and enjoying a “perfectly innocent Pepsi-Cola, the world belonging to us and to our children
and their children, and the beasts of the fields,
and the green, green Earth itself,
had been stolen.”
Photo by Ray in Manila, Creative Commons license via Flickr. Post by Will Willingham.
L.L. Barkat says
In the absence of a single particular noun I think there are poems, perhaps. Each great poem a kind of noun itself, built up by walking around and around a thing and accumulating the sense of it, so that you could point to the poem and say: this, this is what I mean.
I’ve been reading Agha Shahid Ali for my April poet. Yesterday, I read a poem that seemed to be about the death of his grandmother, for which there is no single noun that could capture the whole of the loss. I loved this:
“She is still somehow holding the world together: she is naming the roses.”
LW Willingham says
I like this idea that a poem can become a sort of noun in itself, not in the sense of a single idea, but that it somehow becomes this cohesive unit.
She is naming the roses.
Yes, like that right there.
Laura Lynn Brown says
One marvelous thing about all the things he chooses to describe in “Special Problems in Vocabulary” is that anyone who’s experienced any of them knows exactly what he means. They are common enough, maybe, that they SHOULD have a word.
And he does find language for them, doesn’t he? So maybe the point of claiming a lack of appropriate word for such common and yet extremely specific things is actually a call to do the work of describing them. And acnowledging, even celebrating, that they’re bigger than one word can hold.
Here’s a link to the poem: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/58453/special-problems-in-vocabulary