book club, poetry, poetry and business, poetry teaching resources, The Heart Aroused, writer's group resources

The Heart Aroused: Chaos and Complexity


The Heart Aroused w Mug Sandra Heska King

A few years ago, I was asked to train a mixed group of a dozen or so new staff in an expanding claim office. About half were experienced adjusters hired from other insurance companies. Skilled negotiators and problem solvers, they needed only to learn the company’s IT systems and procedures.

The rest were promotions from within the company’s own “fast track” unit, handling straightforward fender benders. They were masters of procedures and technology, but needed to learn the nuances of coverage, liability and valuing things with no price tags, like arms and legs, time and companionship.

Throughout the week, I felt crushed by the fortress of the Claims Procedural Manual that hemmed in these young upstarts. They succeeded on the conveyor belt of claim handling because they steadfastly followed a scripted code of “if-then.” Within precisely metered scenarios, they knew exactly when to say yes and when to say no. They could rattle off the approved vendors for any city in the nation. The multiplier to depreciate a Toyota’s headlight sat ready at the tip of their tightly lashed tongues.

But they couldn’t stray from the prescription even when following it would prove disastrous. Loosed from their strict robotic tethers, they froze at the one thing a successful adjuster (or a successful anyone, for that matter) must be able to do: the right thing at the right time for the right reasons. As Anne Sexton wrote,

But suicides have a special language
Like carpenters they want to know which tools
They never ask why build.

They’d been squeezed through management’s portal of rigid procedures until the core claims principle — Pay what we owe: not a penny more, not a penny less — was less an undergirding philosophy than an exact dollar amount calculated by simple algebra.

In the final chapters of The Heart Aroused, David Whyte follows Coleridge’s haunting vision of a flock of starlings in our unending quest for order amid chaos.

The starlings drove along like smoke . . . misty . . . without volition — now a circular area inclined in an arc — now a globe, now . . . a complete orb into an ellipse . . . and still it expands and condenses, some moments glimmering and shivering, dim and shadowy, now thickening, deepening, blackening! (p. 216)

According to Whyte, the flock, “a powerful personality without a solid identity,” might describe the modern corporate workplace, always shifting and changing in the face of volatile markets, continuous improvement, and breakneck technology. Our kneejerk response to the chaos may be to yank and stretch it into clean linear order. But he calls us instead to embrace the vital intertwining of chaos and order, and more, to live in the boundary waters flowing between the two.

Computer modeling shows that scenes such as Coleridge’s glorious starlings do not appear from regulated efforts to “form a flock” but from accumulated individual action surging within a few simple parameters. This beautifully (un)orchestrated movement is the result of interrelated parts responding to the shifts of others.

Allowing the science of complexity — and the poetic tradition — to play out naturally in the maze of our cubicle floors is to “fold meaning into the simplest elements and allow complexity to emerge from their natural self-generation.”

Within our organizations, Whyte says, we strangle innovation and creativity, ordering complexity away through repressive rules and protocols.

It is astonishing to witness the human ability to . . . take on every possible kind of experience in an ordered, burdensome way, as if we could not countenance the possibility of standing upright for a single moment, freed from the extra weight of the structures we love to carry with us. A simple love for the purity of the piano becomes a schedule of lessons we can no longer fit into our schedule. A step toward a subject for which we have a passion becomes a costly exercise in college fees and course requirements . . .” (p. 254)

Whyte wants me to believe my trainees were not “herbivorous animals about to stampede out of control unless you are constantly riding the herd.” Given a clear set of boundaries coupled with freedom to adapt and imagine, perhaps they could look like a spectacular flock of starlings on the move. Wordsworth wrote,

There is a dark invisible workmanship
that reconciles discordant elements
and makes them move in one society.

I almost get the idea he wants us to trust folks.


Is such trust reasonable? Is it even possible? What do you think? We conclude our discussion of The Heart Aroused: Poetry and the Preservation of the Soul today. Our new book club begins April 4th, featuring Rumors of Water: Thoughts on Creativity & Writing. Come along?

Photo by Sandra Heska King. Used with permission. Post by Lyla Lindquist of A Different Story.


Buy a year of Every Day Poems, just $2.99— Read a poem a day, become a better poet. In March we’re exploring the theme Angels.

Every Day Poems Driftwood

Your Comments

13 Comments so far

  1. You’re so good, Lyla.

    As an editor, part of my job is to trust my writers, but to wisely oversee them. I want them to sound like themselves, but with proper punctuation that fits within our magazine’s style. A lot of what I do is subjective (as is your job), yet also within a framework (for me, AP Stylebook; for you, some insurance code).

  2. You help people sound like themselves. I just keep saying that over and over to myself.

    What kind of gift is that, that you get to give?

    Trusting people with the subjective is very hard. Misapplied, rules give us something to squeeze them back into and give us a sense of control again. But I like how you put yours to work. To help people sound like themselves, within the given parameters.

  3. L. L. Barkat says:

    And that’s exactly what you were up against, Lyla—a code that had taken over the voices of the employees. It really is hard to be a person who knows how to work creatively within a basic framework.

    Hmmm. Maybe that’s why I like to make my own frameworks. More room to talk (oh I do love to chat :)

  4. You know, some industries are just not the place where one finds groundswells of creativity. I’m starting to believe that perhaps there’s a way to introduce it into mine. David Whyte is filling my head with subversive thoughts. :)

  5. I imagine the impression
    that’s made once
    a line is concluded.

  6. Glynn says:

    My contribution is here: I’ll have a final post tomorrow. This has been a great discussion – thanks, Lyla, for leading it.

  7. I find this principle of trust to be lacking considerably at my workplace. All too often, we create a rigid guideline because we don’t want to give room for employees to make judgments. And yet, when there is an opportunity to make a judgment call and they miss we are upset. Trust almost seems out of place in such a corporate culture, and yet the result is the very chaos we seek to avoid.

    This book is so thought provoking, and the way you bring these chapters to life, just wonderful.

  8. Charity, I think it’s a pretty huge thing. Every manager I’ve ever had that has actually communicated trust to me has gotten nothing short of the best I have to offer. But keep imposing new rules, and tying them tighter, and I will do the least amount required to stay in the lines. I think trust has to be one of our most powerful our most powerful gifts.

  9. Lyla and Co., Thank you for the conversation around this book. Such a privilege to eavesdrop and feel inspired by your words–inspired to read the book (someday) but more, inspired to live creatively within the constraints of my own (very non-corporate) life.


  1. The Poet of the Workplace | TweetSpeak Poetry - August 21, 2012

    [...] poet of the workplace, like most writers, works best in solitude. And in that solitude the poet internalizes the culture, [...]

  2. English Teaching Resources: Incidentally, That Lego Could Earn You Six Figures | - February 28, 2014

    […] at Tweetspeak, we’ve heard about insurance adjusters who play with toy cars to figure how to settle a claim. Why not let your students build their own […]

  3. Interview with Colorado Poet Laureate Joseph Hutchison -Pt 3 - November 12, 2014

    […] The Perpetual Bird, that your experience is that “readers who dislike poetry typically dislike complexity, period.” If you do, or had to, argue for teaching “difficult” poems in the classroom, what […]

Share with our Community

Post a comment

Take How to Read a Poem

Get the Introduction, the Billy Collins poem, and Chapter 1

How to Read a Poem by Tania Runyan

Free with tweet

Subscribe to our newsletter

Grab the Quote a Day Widget


Poetry for Life? Here's our manifesto on the matter...

Poetry for Life: The 5 Vital Approaches

Help make it happen. Post The 5 Vital Approaches on your site!

Learn to Write Form Poems

Whether or not you end up enjoying the form poem, we've seen the value of building your skills through writing in form.

One reader who explored the villanelle was even featured in Every Day Poems!

How to Write a Ballad

How to Write a Catalog Poem

How to Write a Ghazal

How to Write a Haiku

How to Write an Ode

How to Write a Pantoum

How to Write a Sestina

How to Write a Sonnet

How to Write a Villanelle

They Bring Poetry for Life

Meet our wonderful partners, who bring "poetry for life" to students, teachers, librarians, businesses, employees—to all sorts of people, across the world.

All top
I am

© 2015 . Powered by WordPress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium WordPress Themes